Press release from the Church of England
College of Bishops June 2023
07/06/2023
The Church of England’s College of Bishops met in London over the past two days to pray and discuss progress on implementing the recent decision of General Synod on sexuality and marriage.
Bishops heard detailed updates on the work of the three implementation groups set up following the Synod debate which considered proposals to offer prayers of thanksgiving, dedication and for God’s blessing for same-sex couples.
Meeting both in small groups and in joint session, the bishops reviewed progress made on refining a set of texts, known as Prayers of Love and Faith, which could be offered in Churches voluntarily.
They also engaged with questions to be considered by the implementation group developing new pastoral guidance. And they discussed what pastoral reassurance could be required to ensure freedom of conscience for clergy and laity when the Prayers of Love and Faith come into use.
The meeting of the College, which includes all the serving bishops of the Church of England, did not take any formal decisions but provided feedback to inform the ongoing work of the implementation groups.
The House of Bishops, which is made up of diocesan bishops and some others, met at the end of the meeting of the College and formally agreed to bring an update on the progress made to Synod which next meets in July in York.
Notes
Perhaps I’m missing something, but the language used seems to avoid any implication that Issues is being withdrawn…
“The meeting of the College… did not take any formal decisions”
Does it have any decision-making powers in any context?
As an aside, I don’t recall the RC College of Bishops having any without the authority of the Pope.
It feels like this statement has got amendment ‘g’ written between the lines.
“The proposals would not change the Church’s doctrine of Holy Matrimony.” So that’s alright then?
Isn’t that what the majority voted for at the last General Synod?
It’s disingenuous. Bishops taking advantage of the fact that the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 created two different forms of marriage, hence the requirement to introduce the quadruple lock to ensure that Canon Law was not at variance. The Cornes amendment was designed to appease (and score points on behalf of the ConEvos) and may have ensured the amended motion passed. But to say the doctrine of the CofE is that marriage is between one man and one woman, and is immutable, is frankly an unhelpful definition of marriage.