Thinking Anglicans

Getting answers to safeguarding questions is slow

On Tuesday, Richard Scorer (Principal Lawyer at Slater and Gordon) wrote on behalf of one of his clients, Gilo, to both the archbishops. This was a follow-up to an earlier letter of 23 June 2023, to which no substantive reply has yet been received.

The full text of both letters can be read here:

Presumably, it will now fall exclusively to the Archbishop of York to reply.

The first letter was concerned with a meeting which included both National Safeguarding Team members, and representatives of Ecclesiastical Insurance, that took place in August 2016, and the handling of an earlier (2020) complaint about that event.

The second letter seeks to discover the outcome of a further meeting held in June 2024 by the Archbishops’ Council Audit Committee to examine how that 2020 complaint had been handled. To date no report has been issued (and the original 2023 questions remain unanswered).

In addition, the second letter refers to more recent questions raised by Gilo in relation to the York diocesan Past Cases Review 2. Again, no answers have yet been received.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Interested Observer
Interested Observer
2 hours ago

It is interesting, is it not, that Welby and Cottrell cannot find time in their busy schedule to answer these letters, and yet can write at length in support of John Sentamu being given a PtO over the head of another bishop. That’s a very telling insight into their priorities: their mates first, corporate protection second, survivors a far distant third.

Gilo
2 hours ago

Richard Scorer has received no response from either Archbishop across 16 months.

Screenshot_20241113_201130_OneDrive
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x